Close Menu
    What's Hot

    6 Weeks Out: SPiCE International 2026 to Bring First-Hand Product Perspectives to Asia’s Gaming Markets

    October 13, 2026

    Dutch Blockchain Week announces 2027 dates and return to Johan Cruijff ArenA

    October 13, 2026

    Why an $88 billion bank reserve drop doesn’t prove a Bitcoin liquidity squeeze – yet

    October 2, 2026
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Meo Crypto
    • News
    • Web3
    • Gaming
    • RWA
    • Exchanges
    • Event
    Meo Crypto
    Home » Coin Metrics revises 19 months of ETF wallet data but by how much?
    Bitcoin

    Coin Metrics revises 19 months of ETF wallet data but by how much?

    Thi NienBy Thi NienSeptember 23, 2026No Comments3 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Telegram Copy Link
    Coin Metrics revises 19 months of ETF wallet data but by how much?
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email Copy Link

    Coin Metrics corrected more than 19 months of Bitcoin ETF-related on-chain data, leaving users of its identified-wallet series to reassess any analysis built on the affected history.

    The Sept. 22 status notice says the correction covers Bitcoin data from Feb. 7, 2025 through Sept. 17, 2026. Coin Metrics listed 35 affected daily series and 25 hourly series, including ETF deposits, withdrawals, transfer counts and transactions. The daily list also included net-flow and supply measures.

    Related Reading

    Bitcoin ETFs just lost $463 million as the Fed puts BTC at risk of losing $75,000



    These are provider-derived observations of activity involving blockchain addresses Coin Metrics identifies as ETF-owned, rather than official ETF share-creation, redemption or fund-accounting records.

    The notice does not state what caused the recalculation. Moreover, it gives no before-and-after values, aggregate difference or percentage change; does not say whether the revisions generally raised or lowered the figures; and does not identify the largest adjustment or any affected research.

    What the correction can change

    Coin Metrics’ deposit methodology defines an ETF deposit as assets sent during an interval to an address the company identifies as ETF-owned. Dollar-denominated deposit flows are calculated from native-unit flows using its PriceUSD metric.

    Its withdrawal methodology counts assets leaving the control of identified ETF addresses. For Bitcoin withdrawals, Coin Metrics excludes the effect of change outputs, so coins returned to the same fund cluster are not counted as a separate inflow.

    Coverage is another constraint. Coin Metrics says its ETF transaction-count metric includes only ETFs and addresses it has identified, making that specific metric a minimum potential value. The daily correction list also reaches its ETF supply series.

    Related Reading

    $19B could “vanish” from Bitcoin ETFs without a single Bitcoin being sold



    Wallet movements cannot be treated as a one-to-one proxy for authorized-participant creations or redemptions. Coin Metrics measures attributed blockchain activity, while the regulated fund process concerns orders for ETF shares, including the in-kind mechanism permitted under the SEC’s July 2025 approval. The Sept. 22 notice describes a correction to Coin Metrics Network Data, not a revision to issuer records.

    The practical impact is therefore limited to work that used the affected Coin Metrics series. Anyone who stored those daily or hourly values, or used them in models, charts or research covering the corrected interval, may need to backfill the history and rerun that work. The notice does not show that unrelated ETF analysis changed.

    Related Reading

    The $63 billion revolving door carrying the entire US Bitcoin ETF market



    Until Coin Metrics publishes deltas or a fuller explanation, the responsible conclusion remains narrow: the provider changed a broad slice of its ETF-wallet picture, but has not shown the public how much that picture moved.

    Follow on Google News Follow on Flipboard
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleBitcoin ETFs just erased a $5.7 billion hole, but profit-taking is swallowing the new demand
    Next Article Stablecoins hold nearly $200 billion in US debt, but money funds bought the surge
    Thi Nien

    Related Posts

    Why an $88 billion bank reserve drop doesn’t prove a Bitcoin liquidity squeeze – yet

    October 2, 2026

    Sentora split 50% Aave revenue, but suppliers absorb all losses

    September 30, 2026

    Hut 8 locks in $1B credit line, but faces 40% liquidity rules

    September 29, 2026

    Bitcoin drops to $82,000 on US data, and inflation fear is blamed

    September 29, 2026

    Fed guarantees 2-day stablecoin payouts, but $76B remains blocked

    September 29, 2026

    El Salvador targets $9 billion in transfers, but chooses stablecoins

    September 29, 2026
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Economy News

    6 Weeks Out: SPiCE International 2026 to Bring First-Hand Product Perspectives to Asia’s Gaming Markets

    By PR ManagerOctober 13, 2026

    For its third edition, SPiCE (Strategic Platform for iGaming Conference & Exhibition) International 2026 is…

    Dutch Blockchain Week announces 2027 dates and return to Johan Cruijff ArenA

    October 13, 2026

    Why an $88 billion bank reserve drop doesn’t prove a Bitcoin liquidity squeeze – yet

    October 2, 2026
    Top Trending

    6 Weeks Out: SPiCE International 2026 to Bring First-Hand Product Perspectives to Asia’s Gaming Markets

    By PR ManagerOctober 13, 2026

    For its third edition, SPiCE (Strategic Platform for iGaming Conference & Exhibition)…

    Dutch Blockchain Week announces 2027 dates and return to Johan Cruijff ArenA

    By PR ManagerOctober 13, 2026

    Amsterdam, [5 October 2026] – Dutch Blockchain Week (DBW) today announced the…

    Why an $88 billion bank reserve drop doesn’t prove a Bitcoin liquidity squeeze – yet

    By Thi NienOctober 2, 2026

    Wednesday reserves fell $88.236 billion while their weekly average rose $17.897 billion, exposing the limits of reserve-based Bitcoin liquidity signals. The post Why an $88 billion bank reserve drop doesn’t prove a Bitcoin liquidity squeeze – yet appeared first on CryptoSlate.

    Advertisement

    Your source for the serious news. This demo is crafted specifically to exhibit the use of the theme as a news site. Visit our main page for more demos.

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
    • News
    • Web3
    • NFTs
    • Gaming
    • Exchanges
    • Get In Touch
    © 2026 ThemeSphere. Designed by ThemeSphere.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.